There has been some interesting discussion in Genea-land lately about who to include in family trees. Certainly for those with UK or European ancestry, it won’t be uncommon to find ancestors who lived with or were raised by someone other than their parents. In all likelihood there was no formal adoption. They child may or may not have assumed the surname of the family that raised them. But that child is considered as much a member of the family as any biological child would be.
There is little argument that step children get included in family trees – sometimes connected to an extensive line on their “other” family, sometimes not. Adopted children get included with a notation that they are adopted. Those who know about their biological families may chose to add that information into their trees.
But what of grandchildren raised by grandparents? Nieces and Nephews raised by aunts? Cousins or children of cousins raised by another cousin? Neighbour children raised by your ancestors?
Family tree software allows us to acknowledge a child’s status as a “step” child, “adopted” child, “foster” child or “family member”. But what of children who were raised as part of the family but had no blood connection, legal status or connection through marriage? Do you acknowledge children under “other”? Or do you not include them?
I have a large maternal family. My grandfather fathered – and raised – 21 children. All but one survived to adulthood. We often had “other bairns” in the household. Sometimes for a short time, sometimes for a long time. Regardless, they remained connected to us and were considered “kin”. In my family, anyone who was raised as a Crawford or who was “claimed” as a Crawford is a Crawford. Therefore, they are included in our Crawford family tree, our Crawford newsletter and anything else we share as Crawfords.
In my paternal line, the family wasn’t quite that large, but a number of my uncles and aunts raised children that had no connection to them whatsoever. These children are considered siblings to my cousins, aunts or uncles to the children of my cousins. While they have that emotional status, they don’t seem to be included in the tree.
How do YOU handle children who were raised by your ancestors but were not “theirs” by marriage, blood or adoption?
(featured image courtesy of http://katesmithletters.com/)
Scottish born, Canadian raised, Christine had the best of both worlds, growing up immersed in Scottish culture. Realizing that others of the Scots diaspora were not as fortunate, she started her business, Genealogy Tours of Scotland to allow others researching their Scottish roots the opportunity to return to the land of their ancestors, conduct family history research and deepen their sense of belonging to their ancestral kin.